Lisa Rubin Attorney, Wikipedia, Wiki, Parents, Lawyer, Bio -: The off-air legal expert for The Rachel Maddow Show is former litigator Lisa Rubin. Lisa currently holds these jobs at Segal Centre for Performing Arts.
Lisa Rubin Bio
| Name | Lisa Rubin |
| Nickname | Lisa |
| Age | 45 years old in (2023) |
| Date Of Birth | 12 November 1977 |
| Profession | Executive Director |
| Religion | Christian |
| Nationality | American |
| Birthplace | New York, USA |
Lisa Rubin Measurement
| Height | 5 Feet 7 Inch |
| Weight | 76 Kg |
| Eye Colour | Brown |
| Hair Colour | Blonde |
Lisa Rubin Educational Qualifications
| School | High schools |
| College or University | McGill University |
| Educational Degree | Bachelor’s Degree |
Lisa Rubin Family
| Father | Not Known |
| Mother | Not Known |
| Brother / Sister | Not Known |
| Children | Not Known |
Lisa Rubin’s Marital Status
| Marital Status | Married |
| Suppose Name | Jon Oram |
| Affairs | Frances Benioff |
Lisa Rubin’s Net Worth
| Net Worth in Dollars | $1-5 Million |
| Salary | Not Known |
Lisa Rubin’s Social Media Accounts
Lisa Rubin News
Despite receiving a warning to rein in his frequent outbursts, the judge supervising the former president’s lawsuit about an election plot was targeted once more by Donald Trump.
The former president shared a quote from U.S. District Jude Tanya Chutkan, a well-known administer of harsh sentences for Jan. 6 insurrectionists, as she handed down charges to one of the thousands of rioters who laid siege to the Capitol, calling Chutkan “highly partisan” and “VERY BIASSED AND UNFAIR”
The fiercely biassed Judge Tanya Chutkan said the comment below while angrily sentencing a J-6er in October 2022. She plainly wants to lock me up. REALLY BIASED AND UNFAIR!” In an early morning Truth, Trump stated the following before mentioning Chutkan’s sentence:
I can see the videos. I can see footage of the flags, signs, hats, and clothing that people were sporting and carrying. And the protesters were loyal to one man rather than the Constitution, which most of the people standing in front of me seem woefully ignorant of, nor were they loyal to the ideals of our nation or the foundational principles of democracy. It is a blind loyalty to one person, who is still at large today. “Judge Tanya Chutkan!”
In new post, Trump points to quote from Judge Chutkan, who said many J6ers mobbed Capitol and go to jail because of 'blind loyalty to one person who…remains free to this day.' Says Chutkan 'obviously wants me behind bars' and is 'VERY BIASED & UNFAIR!'https://t.co/X2zS1rg5Pz pic.twitter.com/vFZwONMizA
— Byron York (@ByronYork) August 14, 2023Additionally, Trump reposted a post that erroneously stated Chutkan “openly admitted she’s running election interference against Trump.”
Lisa Rubin, a legal analyst for MSNBC, refuted the assertion.
It should be apparent, but I was present, and she stated the exact opposite: Her decision-making would not be influenced by the outcome of the election or Trump’s participation in it. Justice suffers when one judge’s attempts to be unbiased are perceived as interference. Donald Trump? Tweeted she.
This should be obvious, but I was there—and she said exactly the opposite: The fact of the election and Trump’s role within it would not impact her decision making. When one judge’s striving for impartiality is broadcast as interference, justice suffers. Will Trump? https://t.co/6Ui96JLu1v
— Lisa Rubin (@lawofruby) August 13, 2023The House select committee looking into the Jan. 6 attacks had ordered Trump to turn over White House communications, and Chutkan, an Obama-era appointee, was one of the first federal judges in Washington, D.C., to examine Trump’s attempts to exercise presidential power.
The former president, presumably unable to remain silent because of his ongoing legal difficulties, has already stated that he will be asking for Chutkan’s recusal.
Trump earlier posted on Truth Social, “THERE IS NO WAY I CAN GET A FAIR TRIAL WITH THE JUDGE ‘ASSIGNED’ TO THE RIDICULOUS FREEDOM OF SPEECH/FAIR ELECTIONS CASE.” Everyone is aware of this, including her. We will be requesting the recusal of this judge right away on very strong grounds, as well as a change of venue outside of Washington, D.C.
Trump’s attorney John Lauro quickly responded to his client’s remarks, claiming that there were no urgent plans to seek recusal and that the former president had only been speaking “with a layman’s political sense.”
We haven’t reached a definitive conclusion regarding that matter, Lauro stated.
Judge Chutkan conducted a hearing on Friday to go through a protective order that special counsel Jack Smith’s team had suggested to stop Trump from making case-related information public through his social media outbursts. After Trump posted the following threatening remark on Truth Social: “If you go after me, I’m coming after you!” prosecutors had already requested Chutkan to obtain a protective order.
She warned Lauro about Trump’s “inflammatory” remarks throughout the hearing and threatened to expedite his trial if he persisted.
Chutkan stated, “I advise you and your client to exercise particular prudence in your public pronouncements regarding this issue. I promise to do whatever it takes to protect the fairness of these processes.
If your client wants to make public statements online, that must give way to witness security, she said.
The orderly administration of justice must take precedence over the fact that he is waging a political campaign, according to Chutkan. “If that means he can’t say exactly what he wants to say about the witnesses in this case, then that’s how it has to be.”
“Even arguably ambiguous statements from parties or their counsel, if they can be reasonably interpreted to intimidate witnesses or to prejudice potential jurors, can threaten the process,” she continued during the hearing. The more inflammatory comments a party makes about this case that can taint the jury pool, the more urgent it will be that we move toward trial as soon as possible.
Neal Kaytal, the former acting solicitor general, wrote on Twitter that it “would not surprise me if Judge Chutkan called a hearing, with Trump’s presence, given his new remarks.”
Bradley Moss, an attorney, wrote: “He is just daring the judge now.”
“He is powerless to resist. And that’s outrageous; it’s not an explanation. Elie Honig, a legal commentator for CNN, said Trump was attempting to build the framework to press for her recusal on Monday. “It is directly contrary to what the judge just warned him against,” Honig said. Judge Chutkan is not going to support it, nor are judges generally. Additionally, I believe it is necessary to note that Donald Trump’s claims are wholly unfair and unjustified. Other January 6 cases included her. She has treated them well. She has correctly sentenced them. She hasn’t had any decisions reversed on appeal. Therefore, these remarks are simply obscene. It will be intriguing to watch what Judge Chutkan decides to do in this situation. If so, what exactly?
Also Read :
ncG1vNJzZmignpe0tnrNnqtopJmorm6%2B1Jugp2c%3D